by tai38 » Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:19 am
If your 18 year old teenage neighbor can sue you for unpaid babysitting fees...why can't this daycare? What is the LEGAL difference? They provided a service and you must LEGALLY pay for it. You did the right thing regarding taking the kid out ASAP, but how does the fact of the matter affect services ALREADY tendered? What would be different NOW if they were licensed in the past or not??? This is a slam dunk win for the daycare.
Edit:
No offense taken, but THE LAW says she can sue you. You had a contract and you breached it....end of story. Services were provided to you and you MUST legally pay for them. The place being unlicensed DOES NOT entitle you to free daycare in any way. Your kid was watched....you have to pay. If you are unhappy with the quality of the care or the status of the business, then you stop using their services and pay for those services provided. Its like eating an entire steak dinner and then trying to get out of paying by saying it wasn't cooked to your liking. The 18 year old wasn't in your questions...I was merely pointing out that if an "unlicensed" 18 year old has the legal ability to sue you (and yes they clearly have that ability) it makes no difference that the daycare was unlicensed in bringing a suit against you. There is no law that says only licensed and/or registered businesses are able to bring civil suits. In fact, the VAST majority of civil cases are between unlicensed individuals.
As for the LLC issue......how do you know for a fact that the LLC was not incorporated in another state? There are no laws that say a business MUST be incorporated in the state in which they do business in. You would be AMAZED at the number of businesses incorporated in Deleware and Nevada that do ZERO business in those state!