by Fearnleah » Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:52 am
http://www.copperpenney.com/reading/images/handmaid.jpg But reading alone isn't enough. There are things that every reader is expected to learn from the reading and most of us, when we are young, need a guide to point the way. Your teacher should do most of this but sometimes we miss something or the teacher isn't that good at leading you to where he or she wants you to go. I've always welcomed my students to get all the supplementary materials they could find on any book. I've read them all so I know if they cheat and copy or if they really haven't read the book and are trying to squeeze by with a study guide instead of the book. I do hope that you're not trying to do a chapter by chapter analysis of the entire book in one day. It's too much to do in such a short time. This is an assignment that has to be done over time if it's to be done well. The first time I read The Scarlet Letter I was too carried away with my own reaction to the story to truly gain any deeper understanding. I needed some help. There is no shame in asking for and getting some help and guidance. There are some basic sites to guide you in your reading of any classic piece of literature. I always start with a google search. I put in the title of the book and see what pops up. I put in The Handmaid's Tale and at the top of the list is sparknotes.com. This is a basic study guide and I always expect every student to know about it. http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/handmaid/ I suggest you look at the page for Themes, Motifs, and symbols. This should give you a guide as to what are the big issues in the book that permeate throughout. The first thing on that page is that women's bodies are political instruments. Then language as a tool of power. After that comes the causes of complacency. Listed as motifs are rape and sexual violence, religious terms used as political terms, and so on. All of these come with brief but adequate explanations. As you analyze each chapter you not only want to include what happened and who did it happen to but mention the bigger issues and how they are developed. Sparknotes can give you a chapter by chapter summary too but I strongly urge you not to copy it. Chances are that you'll get caught when you can certainly do it yourself. Enhance the basics on each chapter though with how the big symbols, ideas, and motifs are built into that chapter. Try to explain how the characters change or your understanding was enhanced because of something he or she does. There is a message board where students discuss and share information about the book. Don't copy what others share but you might find it very useful. http://mb.sparknotes.com/mb.epl?b=469&m=1167997&t=332013&w=1 Anti-study offers a list of free guides for any book. http://www.antistudy.com/free_book_notes/The_Handmaid%27s_Tale.php I very much liked this site with its insights into the story: http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/science_fiction/handmaid.html Many readers are surprised to hear Atwood's novel labeled science fiction, but it belongs squarely in the long tradition of near-future dystopias which has made up a large part of SF since the early50s. SF need not involve technological innovation: it has been a long-standing principle that social change can provide the basis for SF just as well as technical change. The Handmaid's Tale is partly an extrapolation of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, attempting to imagine what kind of values might evolve if environmental pollution rendered most of the human race sterile. It is also the product of debates within the feminist movement in the 70s and early 80s. Atwood has been very much a part of that movement, but she has never been a mere mouthpiece for any group, always insisting on her individual perspectives. The defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment, the rise of the religious right, the election of Ronald Reagan, and many sorts of backlash(mostly hugely misinformed) against the women's movement led writers like Atwood to fear that the antifeminist tide could not only prevent further gains for women, but turn back the clock. Dystopias are a kind of thought experiment which isolates certain social trends and exaggerates them to make clear their most negative qualities. They are rarely intended as realistic predictions of a probable future, and it is pointless to criticize them on the grounds of implausibility. Atwood here examines some of the traditional attitudes that are embedded in the thinking of the religious right and which she finds particularly threatening. But another social controversy also underlies this novel. During the early 80s a debate raged(and continues to rage, on a lower level) about feminist attitudes toward sexuality and pornography in particular. Outspoken feminists have taken all kinds of positions: that all erotica depicting women as sexual objects is demeaning, that pornography was bad though erotica can be good, that although most pornography is demeaning the protection of civil liberties is a greater good which requires the toleration of freedom for pornographers, however distasteful, even that such a thing as feminist pornography can and should be created. The sub-theme of this tangled debate which seems to have particularly interested and alarmed Atwood is the tendency of some feminist anti-porn groups to ally themselves with religious anti-porn zealots who oppose the feminists on almost every other issue. The language of "protection of women" could slip from a demand for more freedom into a retreat from freedom, to a kind of neo-Victorianism. After all, it was the need to protect "good" women from sex that justified all manner of repression in the 19th century, including confining them to the home, barring them from participating in the arts, and voting. Contemporary Islamic women sometimes argue that assuming the veil and traditional all-enveloping clothing is aimed at dealing with sexual harassment and sexual objectification. The language is feminist, but the result can be deeply patriarchal, as in this novel. Without some sense of the varying agendas of mid-20th-century feminists and the debates among those agendas this novel will not make much sense. Women who participated in the movement from the late sixties and early seventies responded to this novel strongly, often finding it extremely alarming. Younger women lacking the same background often found it baffling. Ask yourself as you read not whether events such as it depict s are likely to take place, but whether the attitudes and values it conveys are present in today's society. Atwood's strong point is satire, often hilarious, often very pointed. Humor is in short supply in this novel, but it is a satire nonetheless. Atwood's love for language play(apparent in the anagram of her name she uses for her private business "O. W. Toad") is a major feature of the protagonist of this novel. Her jokes are dark and bitter, but they are pervasive. There are numerous biblical references in the following notes. You should provide yourself with a Bible, preferably a King James Version, which is what Atwood uses most of the time. Or use a great searchable Web Bible. http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/science_fiction/handmaid.html I like his suggestion that you use a Bible or a Web Bible to deal with the Biblical references as they come up so that you don't miss out on understanding. Good luck with your assignment. Remember to give yourself enough time to do a good job. http://webspace.ringling.edu/~emcguire/fourthyear/handmaid2.jpg