I Was Told For A Hair Drug Test To Acutally Be Positive For Meth. It Has To Show Positive For Both Amp. And Meth. True?

by **Vicente** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:05 am

I read somewhere that for a hair drug test to be without a doubt positve for methamphetemines, the results are to show positive for both amphetemines and methamphetemines. Not one or the other. Is this true?

by **Michio** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 4:04 am

Makes sense...all I know is methamphetamine = bad. Don't do it...if you are using it stop. What I am positive of is it will eventually kill you. Very awful stuff...

by **Vipponah** » Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:56 am

It is true.Methamphetamine is a type of amphetamine...so if your hair is positive for methamphetamine it will basically be automatically positive for amphetamine...

by **Haslet** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:56 am

Hmmmmm... a rather detailed question! I suspect that different labs have different criteria. It's quite possible Home Depot is happy if you don't test for everything, but Brinks might be more picky. You probably have some right to learn what the criteria are, but that's going to be a state or local law.

by **Kendon** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:13 am

Did I misunderstand the question? I read it to be saying that both had to be positive to be "without a doubt positve" in the legal or employment sense. Sounded like someone was looking for an out, to me - that you couldn't be proven to be using meth just by testing positive for it, alone - but that it had to be positive for both, and if it wasn't positive for both, then it wasn't proof.Does any of this make sense?

Advertisments:

Sponsor Links: