by gervaso81 » Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:12 am
I've had several conflicting opinions on this matter so someone please clarify. My car recently sustained $8,500 in damage but was not totaled. My car is worth around $10,000 fair market value (precrash). I found online a MN statute that says if the damage exceeds 70% of the value of the car (which in my case it did) you must disclose. However, my autobody guy and my insurance company say this is not true. Personally, I belive the MN statute I found is what I should go by since it was a government website. The car is fixed wonderfully and looks better than before the crash but legally I have to disclose the damage done? Right?