Not logged in? Join one of the bigest Law Forums on the Internet! Join Now!   Latest blog post: Research Law Professors Before Choosing Law Schools

Advertisments:




Sponsor Links:

Discount Legal Forms
Discounted Legal Texts


My Rights As Your Dog Owner

Business Law discussions

My Rights As Your Dog Owner

Postby benon » Mon Mar 03, 2014 6:16 pm

I'd to board my pet together with his breeder due to a breakup I was going right on through. I've never visited the breeders home before they arrived and picked him up. Relying them I permitted them to be always a Co-Owner on his AKC registration documents so that they can us him for there women. I've your dog back (Thank God) but they're refusing to sign-off of him they also bred him without my knowledge and are presently under investagation with-there local animal control because of the existing situations and non-compliance of rabies vacuum also the had 42 pets! I'd no indisputable fact that this is exactly what was happening I thought my dog was being looked after and I paid-for all vet bills and meals while he was there. They got stud cash from my puppy not really giving me half they've many pending costs with animal control. They state that they'll sign-off my puppy (That's in my own posession) when they've there litters authorized. But when AKC discovers about there analysis with animal control they'll be stopped and they can not sign-off any puppy or enroll any litters. I've proven this dog for a champ name I've settled over 1000.00 for this dog to begin and all his OFA health clearances if they're stopped using the AKC then my dog won't ever manage to bred or display nowadays he's destroyed. I've put allot of time and money and love-in my pet and I'd like to understand if filing a suit with small-claims court could be a choice. Please adviseWarm regards
benon
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:01 am
Top

My Rights As A Dog Owner

Postby choviohoya » Tue Mar 04, 2014 3:27 am

That you don't believe I possibly could actually ask the judge to sign total rights title and curiosity about him being that they are under study using the health department and animal control on the quantity of costs? I'd to pay for them another 900$ simply to get him in my custody! Please advise.Kind regards
choviohoya
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 4:45 am
Top

My Rights As A Dog Owner

Postby Leon » Thu Mar 06, 2014 3:32 am

"... I permitted them to be always a Co-Owner on his AKC registration documents so that they can us him for there females."it doesn't create a large amount of sense whenever you study:"... they also bred him without my knowledge..."Were his "AKC" enrollment papers the only real paperwork you've to show possession or that which was placed on these papers merely a rest "so they might us (?) him for [their] women"? "They got stud money from my dog not really giving me half..."You Are liberated to prosecute them for half the money and let them try and show that was not the arrangement.
Leon
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 1:10 pm
Top

My Rights As A Dog Owner

Postby Comyn » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:00 am

The judge sould consider taking it away simply because they have costs of pet negleck and cruelty! After I brought him home he was 15-20 lbs under-weight my vet discovered clicks left from last fall which were lifeless but nonetheless left connected. He'd two cherry eyes in the a watch disease. He'd 3 laserations on each his back and belly. Umong other activities. They'd to convince dog control that they provided him back once again to me so I'm Iam intitled to complete possession on his documents too. Iam likely to small-claims court I submitted today!Hot regards
Comyn
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:15 pm
Top

My Rights As A Dog Owner

Postby Lundie » Fri Mar 07, 2014 4:26 pm

"You do not believe I possibly could actually ask the judge to sign total rights title and curiosity about him because they are under study with the health department and animal control on the quantity of charges?"No.A judge does not have the ability to create someone surrender ownership under the conditions you describe.The health department and animal control charges have nothing to complete with your ownership of the dog.And till you've real financial damages consequently of some action or inaction of the breeder you do not have anywhere togo with this.I'll guess the 900 you paid to obtain the dog back was only a little delicate extortion but I doubt when there is anything you may do about this now.I would not precisely say ignore it but you could need certainly to bide your own time till another thing happens.
Lundie
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2014 8:49 am
Top

My Rights As A Dog Owner

Postby Oegelsby » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:59 pm

I'll always love him no real matter what the end result is. We'd a verbal contract together but this really is what I get for trusting them.But you're right by saying I do have him and he's secure and it'd not change my feelings for him what so ever!!Therefore would your advice be to simply let it get?Warmest regards
Oegelsby
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:43 am
Top

My Rights As A Dog Owner

Postby Suileabhan » Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:39 pm

You GAVE them co-ownership. WHy should the judge take that away from them??
Suileabhan
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 2:09 pm
Top

My Rights As A Dog Owner

Postby Frang » Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:03 am

Perhaps you have considered calling the AKC registration division and telling them of the reality, concerning the reproduction of your dog. Because they(AKC) need a signature to join up a kitten, and might possible help you, with obtaining the registratoin of stated litters ripped. Next time you purchase a dog, visit a dog show and meet up with the handlers and breeders, before generally making the determination to show a dog. Because it have a lot of time, money and work to exhibit pets. Best Of Luck! I was raised displaying both pets and horses, and still display both today.
Frang
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:19 am
Top

My Rights As A Dog Owner

Postby Bax » Fri Mar 14, 2014 12:12 am

If you outlined them as being a co-operator on any files, you will not get very far with any suit concerning the reproduction and the kitten. You MAY have some claim to a department of the profits centered on your curiosity about the dog.Until you really lose the capability to reproduce or show the dog, you probably do not have a personal injury acknowledged by the law.
Bax
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:34 am
Top

My Rights As A Dog Owner

Postby Tiburon » Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:58 pm

I really do not notice that you've any option here.You voluntarily gave co-title towards the breeder.That gave the breeder the right to virtually do whatever they wished with the dog.Iam betting you did not writeup a deal with particular rights and responsibilities therefore the breeder was not required to provide you 50% of anything.You'd have difficulty trying to explain to a judge that you actually have any problems right now as your dog continues to be AKC registered."if they're stopped with the AKC then my dog won't ever manage to bred or display nowadays he's ruined."1 - I Do not observe how you are able to realistically draw that conclusion. You'll have to describe it.2 - even when which was a legitimate summary, it has not happened yet, so you've nothing to prosecute for yet."my puppy won't ever manage to bred or display nowadays he's destroyed. I've put allot of time and money and love in my own dog"are you going to love your dog less if he can not type or show nowadays?
Tiburon
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:04 pm
Top


Return to Business Law

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post