Not logged in? Join one of the bigest Law Forums on the Internet! Join Now!   Latest blog post: Research Law Professors Before Choosing Law Schools

Advertisments:




Sponsor Links:

Discount Legal Forms
Discounted Legal Texts


No True Bill

Criminal Law Discussion Forum

No True Bill

Postby Bronson » Thu May 15, 2014 6:31 am

ok today I found out that he has no true bill on my boyfriends case and the indictment has been taken off. This is a new york case, What does this mean for his case.
Bronson
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 8:16 pm
Top

No True Bill

Postby Absolon » Mon May 19, 2014 10:33 pm

It isn't about reality."With all dur respect you are wrong he is not a gang member"I never said he was.
The event is tied to gangs."the fight that occured was a gang fight He was not involved like I stated before he wasn't even watching the fight There were people standing around as someone threw and bottle into the crowd seeing this ma boyfriend and his friends cross the street and proceeded to the train station when they were stopped by a police officer."That may be the reality, but if he got charged with a crime, even if it was dismissed, then the state has some other evidence to connect him to the event.You can ignore what I'm telling you, but I AM trying to help.
There's no guarantee that this probation violation goes away at the next court date.
Absolon
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 11:30 pm
Top

No True Bill

Postby Everleigh » Thu May 22, 2014 12:25 pm

Sounds like he was involved in a serious event with gang ties.
Hanging around with the wrong people can be the basis of a probation violation.
Everleigh
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 8:30 am
Top

No True Bill

Postby Blithe » Thu May 22, 2014 5:00 pm

ok well he was charged with gang assualt in the first degree but he didn't do it, he was just at the wrong place at the wrong time. Also he was on 5 years probation and his bail was remended twice because of the violation of his probation for being arrested again. The judge refuse to release him he said he wants to find out what part the case is going to what does this mean for him? Also what is the real reason he is still locked up .
Blithe
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:00 pm
Top

No True Bill

Postby Cambeul » Fri May 23, 2014 12:05 am

The responsibility to show a legal fee is evidence beyond an acceptable question - contact that 95% evidenceapproximately. The responsibility to show a probation violation is generally only a variety of evidence - contact that 50.1% proof.Thereis an entire planet of occasions provable between 50.1PERCENT and 94.9% that can not secure a legal sentence, but may be used to break probation.
Cambeul
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:28 am
Top

No True Bill

Postby Adlar » Tue May 27, 2014 1:00 am

A "no accurate bill" is just a finding with a grand jury that there's no possible cause to determine that the crime continues to be committed.>>>>exactly what does this mean for his case.Usually this means the situation is ignored and he ought to be released.Of program, the prosecutor often will document the situation again. But, whilst the saying goes, "a prosecutor may often indict a 'pork sandwich'".So, if you cannot get an indictement the very first time, until there's fresh proof, it often doesn't create much feeling to test it another time. With no gurantees, I Would see this like a excellent sign.
Adlar
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:08 am
Top

No True Bill

Postby Everard » Tue May 27, 2014 6:22 pm

Ok but he does not a PO he reviews to some device each month. He was heading house and also the policeman stopped him, Additionally the policeman set him as well as 13 others who have been concerned, Among The men had body on his top. Additionally the policeman placed on law enforcement statement he was the arresting officer for several 13? Before this he was getting ready to attend his second-year of university and contiue working?
Everard
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 1:30 am
Top

No True Bill

Postby Ifor » Wed May 28, 2014 2:39 am

ok he has an court on the 23 of sept what is the likelihood that he will be release, This will be the third time he has seen the judge about his bail.
Ifor
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:45 pm
Top

No True Bill

Postby Darwyn » Wed May 28, 2014 7:01 am

>>>> The judge won't launch him he explained he really wants to discover what component the situation will exactly what does this mean for him? Additionally what's the actual cause he's still closed up.Now, I am aware. The judge is most likely stating that, as the proof was insufficinet to determine probable cause to maintain an Indictment, exactly the same conduct, or associated conduct, may be used-to discover him in breach of his probation. For instance, even when he wasn't within the battle, if he was normally breaking problems of his probation, the judge may break him.What the end result of the probation violation could be is way too complex to take a position. The conditions of the personis probation and also the result in case of the cancellation could be described differently for every defendant.
Darwyn
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:39 pm
Top

No True Bill

Postby Duncan » Sat Jun 07, 2014 1:58 am

>>>>could this mean on his court sept 23 could he be releasedI'm surprised that he has not already been released.
Duncan
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:24 pm
Top

Next

Return to Criminal Law

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post