Now The Supreme Court Banned The Womens' Class-Action Suit Again Wal Mart, Will Wal Mart Treat Women Worse?

[breasal]

Or may possibly Wal-Mart handle them greater?What may well the organization approach be? Due to the fact they WM Administration now includes a free pass to treat ladies poorly, will they do so?Or will they realize this becoming a opportunity to demonstrate how patient they are?

[Yuuto]

Are you accusing me of lying about my former employees?   Directmale 30 months ago

[Kenriek]

[Sinclaire]

There are fairly handful of girls and men who work for Wal Mart. The same women and men have several females in their lives(wives, daughters, grandchildren, sisters...). I am certain there are men and women in the organization that do think much less of ladies, which is accurate of any cross section of company or society. I uncover it hard to believe that Wal Mart has any written or unspoken policy to conspire against women.   HanoverFist 30 months ago

[Wevers]

I find it funny that people in this question who are defending WalMart since they as soon as had a retailer and they fired anyone who dared raise their voice did not even bother to really educate themselves on what occurred these days.The supreme court did not state Walmart did not treat women worse than males. They did not say WalMart did no incorrect. Todays ruling simply stated that the Supreme court did not uncover adequate similarities among the ladies to permit a class action suit.And envision people acting standing up for the business - being aware of if they didn't, walmart would fire them.My son worked at WalMart as a cashier whilst in higher school. The girl at the register next to him was pregnant, and was not allowed to have a break and go to the bathroom. She was forced to remain at her register, as the manager told her if she left, she would no longer have a job. Right after 5 hours, she urinated on herself. This same shop utilized illegals to come in and clean the store at evening.WalMart is a horrible instance of what occurs when big business is permitted to do whatever they like. Anyone who defends them is an unfeeling excuse for a human.   TurboB 30 months ago

[Comhghall]

But since you weren't part of it you really don't have any first hand knowledge do you   Directmale 30 months ago

[Ace]

they probably won't 'treat' anybody, not that they ever did---what good is a corporation that doesn't throw a party from time to time?   SirEfficePsark 30 months ago

[Wakefield]

Criticism? This isn't about criticism. It's about money, big money. I guess my point is that there is a fine line between the Class Action and extorsion.   happytoes 30 months ago

[Sagar]

If you employed as many people as Wal-Mart does, I can guarantee you would have someone mad enough to sue at any given hour of operation. And there is always a lawyer who will sue a hamburger somewhere.   usmc 30 months ago

[Verddun]

well; statistically speaking; Wal-Mart tends to always have labor law violations under investigation; so the trend would seem to indicate that they will continue to generally push the limits with their workforce.   TheLightWorks 30 months ago