Obtained Fta Notice Though Awaiting Results Of Tbd

[Zacchaeus]

Our issue entails traffic judge within the State-Of: Florida<br />
After months of awaiting caused by the TBD, I ultimately obtained a notice saying I DidN't Come In Courtroom (FTA)<br />
Our breach day is 12/8/2011 <br />
Preliminary Deadline: 01/24/2012<br />
Expansion Date: 03/26/2012 (I flled for an expansion online)<br />
-------------------------<br />
After I examine my standing on LASC Online today. It generally does not display my expansion day and TBD results.<br />
Some tips about what it claims:<br />
Breach Date: 12/08/2011<br />
Preliminary Deadline: 01/24/2012<br />
Situation Status: 40509.5 Holds<br />
Disposition: 01/24/2012<br />
Last Action: Disappointment to Look Maintain<br />
Last Action/<br />
Fresh Look Date: 04/17/2012 in F40<br />
Your quotation happens to be in store standing. Should you not look after this in a regular way, the quotation is likely to be known a group company. <br />
------------------------------<br />
I'm unsure what's happening. Has anybody had any comparable experience.<br />
I've evidence and bill for distributing the TBD on 2/20/2012; I also provide a bill for spending the Help and evidence of processing the expansion online. <br />
I am confused why the courtroom effectively cashed the check which mentioned my request of "NOT LIABLE" in the shape of a TBD, combined with the cost stub by having an "X" designated from the Test by Assertion choice (again per the directions about the courtesy notice)<br />
Does the worker make errors? I am going to trial tomorrow and need to understand ways to get this point exercised. The help for that racing ticket was 4. Presently there is another help for 0 for that FTA.<br />
Thanks so much.te of:

[bax]

When did you get the extension to 3/26? Was that AFTER 1/24?

If you failed to appear or get the extension by 1/24 then THAT is why you have this problem.

[Isadoro]

You are welcome! <br />
I forgot to say that I did so apply for an expansion before distributing the TBD. The worker was confused how I obtained the FTA notice. They'd to contact somebody in the workplace also it required many moments to obtain the TBD from their documents, however they discovered it.<br />
I'm just happy the FTA notice was shipped in error. I cannot think these things happen. These updates may surprise you and cause you to shed sleep.<br />
Today, I'm simply likely to stay and watch for the vedict. I am wanting to discover what happens towards the TBD. I posted this on 2/20/12 and its own today 4/21/12.<br />
The quotation was from 12/08/11, and that I don't believe the official may recall what this quotation was about.<br />
Or maybe, the situation may simply get dismissed.<br />
Correct me basically am incorrect, however the judge has within 3 months to create a choice in the TBD distribution day or even the situation gets ignored? Perhaps I'm incorrect or simply study that somewhere.<br />
I don't understand how extended the consensus will require, but I'll without a doubt be upgrading this subject after I get something.<br />
Finally, thanks for the replies.

[London]

Estimating drmirage<br />
<br />
I've evidence and bill for distributing the TBD on 2/20/2012; I also provide a bill for spending the Help and evidence of processing the expansion online.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
That is excellent... Goodforyou!<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Estimating drmirage<br />
<br />
I am confused why the courtroom effectively cashed the check which mentioned my request of "NOT LIABLE" in the shape of a TBD, combined with the cost stub by having an "X" designated from the Test by Assertion choice (again per the directions about the courtesy notice)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I am guessing they'll possess a better solution than us!!!<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Estimating drmirage<br />
<br />
Does the worker make errors?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Evidently, by your personal expertise, they sure do!

[Cydney]

Estimating drmirage<br />
<br />
Is there a schedule the situation is likely to be ignored if we don't notice from their store quickly?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
You will find NO procedures for termination consequently of the late TBD out come.<br />
Whenever you closed on the website were no assured time-frames and also the courtroom guidelines also particularly suggest that the deadlines and payment dates could be expanded from the courtroom with small option!<br />
Your absolute best choice would be to keep checking using the worker personally, however the only advantage you'll enjoy is knowing where issues remain, nothing more, nothing less!

[Ferrill]

Thanks greatly for that update...<br />
Like a part note, I ought to state that the standing explanation (and even though its main objective would be to explain and revise about their situation), and particularly when it originates from Los Angeles Region, is arbitrary, worthless and much from pursuing any collection standard.

[oakley]

I created a trip towards the courthouse.<br />
It seems that there is an error from the worker. They'd to find my TBD files.<br />
I believe they lost the TBD. Positive thing I held all my records.<br />
They stated it'll consider "Some Time" to obtain a decision.<br />
They've eliminated the FTA and certainly will not postpone my license.<br />
At this time this is exactly what's been updated online.<br />
Cheers for the help.<br />
Judge: Chatsworth Courthouse <br />
9425 Penfield Ave., Chatsworth, California 91311 <br />
(213) 742-1884 <br />
Breach Date: 12/08/2011 <br />
Preliminary Deadline: 01/24/2012 <br />
Case Status: Expansion <br />
Personality: 01/24/2012 <br />
Last Action: Store erased by wrnt deal <br />
Last Action/<br />
Fresh Look Date: 04/17/2012 in Y40

[Abran]

UPDATE:<br />
Nevertheless no information and this is actually the present position online. <br />
Is there a schedule the situation is likely to be ignored if we don't notice from their store quickly?<br />
Thank you.<br />
Judge: Chatsworth Courthouse <br />
9425 Penfield Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311<br />
Breach Date: 12/08/2011<br />
Preliminary Deadline: 01/24/2012<br />
Situation Status: Court<br />
Disposition: 01/24/2012<br />
Last Action: other<br />
Last Action/<br />
Fresh Look Date: 05/25/2012 in TBD