by Caersewiella » Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:09 pm
I believe Mr. Sea is most likely right.
When the quantity you're spending in within the existence of the program is not altering, simply the rate of interest, it results in that possibly the statements emerged in less than planned or creditors did not document their cliam, and several do not. Therefore in the place of claim thirty creditors splitting $10,000 - you've 15 creditors splitting $10,000... Therefore permitting the interest change. OR - if it's interest on a secured debt such as for instance a car, relying on the area and once the car was purchased, you've to pay for it at agreement interest vs. various other decrease rate. Being unsure of the entire facts of one's strategy it's difficult to state.
The trustee is fairly natural, he's not out to screw you, but he's not likely to allow you account a $100 per month strategy either in case your capability to pay is these that you can pay. The trustee however like a standing 13 trustee includes a fiduciary responsibility to make certain that creditors are supplied any disposable income, etc. Therefore he's not just viewing statements and objecting for some (together with your lawyer), he is also ensuring that you're spending what you're necessary to pay, either because of disposable income, low-exempt collateral, etc.
Your lawyer will understand the ins and outs of one's area and how your trustee works. He or she'd function as the perfect someone to be speaking to. And really, if you are not in a 100% payout strategy (again, unfamiliar below) - does it really matter if you're in a 15% interest payout or an 11% interest payout?
After thinking via a little more (I've been from 13s for awhile) - I wonder in the event that you browse the notice wrong. The regular claims often state exactly what the % payment is... Therefore for example an 11% cost would be you're paying 11 cents on the dollar. A 15% payout would be 15 cents on the buck, and obviously 100% payout, you're paying your statements entirely within the strategy.
Charge cards aren't often provided any curiosity about the bankruptcy... the attention and overdue charges quit... Therefore it almost seems in my experience because you cost is not modifications, however the % change - the claims were planned to get 11% payout, probably creditos x, y, z did not file claims, which today enables lenders a -t who did file a 15% payout vs. 11% payout. If this is actually the situation, then you still are getting one heck of a deal. Eliminating 85% of one's debt ---