Not logged in? Join one of the bigest Law Forums on the Internet! Join Now!   Latest blog post: Research Law Professors Before Choosing Law Schools

Advertisments:




Sponsor Links:

Discount Legal Forms
Discounted Legal Texts


Trustee's Responsibility

Discuss the legalities of Bankruptcy Law

Trustee's Responsibility

Postby jamilah38 » Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:35 pm

We reside in Nyc. In 2007 my partner and I submitted a chapter 13 bankruptcy together with the add up to the lawyer & lenders to be reduced in 5 years. Originally, based on the trustee regular claims, it claims the lenders were repaid at 11% interest. I simply received a notice in the trustee the rate of interest hasbeen elevated to 15%. The notice states this increase doesn't enhance the sum paid in regular for the trustee. And does this boost the quantity we shall repay? This price is greater than a number of the charge cards we'd filed bankruptcy on. May be the trustee permitted to do that, boost the rate of interest? We received no reason it was elevated. So just how does this create bankruptcy trustees much better than deceptive lenders?!
jamilah38
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:58 am
Top

Trustee's Obligation

Postby rexton98 » Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:43 am

M Rose:So just how does this create bankruptcy trustees much better than deceptive lenders?!
That's a philosophical issue and it's completely unnecessary for your additional question.M Increased:The notice states this increase doesn't enhance the sum paid in regular for the trustee. And does this boost the quantity we shall repay?
The very best person to ask that question of is the bankruptcy lawyer.
But my estimation is that it could often reduce steadily the quantity of your debt that you really repay.
For instance, if your overall debt was 50,000 and your section 13 payment over 5 years was 1000 monthly centered on your earnings amount, then at 11% attention you'd have settled about 43000 of the debt at the finish of 5 years and the rest of the 7000 of the debt would be released.
Increasing the curiosity to 15% without altering the monthly obligations (you still spend 1000) indicates you'd have settled about 33000 of the debt at the conclusion of 5 years and the rest of the 17000 of the debt would be released.
Therefore it does not actually change lives what the rate of interest is. You still spend exactly the same 60000 from the end-of 5 years. It is simply the dischargeable stability that changes.
Why disparage the trustee when he has not done something to hurt you?
 
rexton98
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 7:45 pm
Top

Trustee's Obligation

Postby Zarad » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:44 am

Do not be unaware. The trustee may be the JUST natural celebration for you personally, not at all a predator whose after your meager resources. The % you're repaying isn't your curiosity, it is your dividend. It likely improved since the quantity of debt your lawyer planned arrived in under what creditors actually stated. So since you've experienced your situation for some time, and obviously the honeymoon phase has ended, youare in the level where you switch on the folks who were really never against you in the very first position. $2000 claims you've previously provided your lawyer heck over this problem which you obviously don't comprehend. Therefore, before you evaluate the trustee for your "deceptive lenders," attempt to believe the way the procedure really works and concerning the functions of everybody in the event, inlcuding your personal.
 
Lawyer = Buddy
Lender = Not your buddy
Trustee = Europe
 
Zarad
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 5:07 am
Top

Trustee's Obligation

Postby Caersewiella » Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:09 pm

I believe Mr. Sea is most likely right. 
When the quantity you're spending in within the existence of the program is not altering, simply the rate of interest, it results in that possibly the statements emerged in less than planned or creditors did not document their cliam, and several do not.  Therefore in the place of claim thirty creditors splitting $10,000 - you've 15 creditors splitting $10,000... Therefore permitting the interest change.  OR - if it's interest on a secured debt such as for instance a car, relying on the area and once the car was purchased, you've to pay for it at agreement interest vs. various other decrease rate.  Being unsure of the entire facts of one's strategy it's difficult to state.
The trustee is fairly natural, he's not out to screw you, but he's not likely to allow you account a $100 per month strategy either in case your capability to pay is these that you can pay.   The trustee however like a standing 13 trustee includes a fiduciary responsibility to make certain that creditors are supplied any disposable income, etc.  Therefore he's not just viewing statements and objecting for some (together with your lawyer), he is also ensuring that you're spending what you're necessary to pay, either because of disposable income, low-exempt collateral, etc.
Your lawyer will understand the ins and outs of one's area and how your trustee works.  He or she'd function as the perfect someone to be speaking to.  And really, if you are not in a 100% payout strategy (again, unfamiliar below) - does it really matter if you're in a 15% interest payout or an 11% interest payout?
After thinking via a little more (I've been from 13s for awhile) - I wonder in the event that you browse the notice wrong.  The regular claims often state exactly what the % payment is... Therefore for example an 11% cost would be you're paying 11 cents on the dollar.  A 15% payout would be 15 cents on the buck, and obviously 100% payout, you're paying your statements entirely within the strategy.
Charge cards aren't often provided any curiosity about the bankruptcy... the attention and overdue charges quit... Therefore it almost seems in my experience because you cost is not modifications, however the % change - the claims were planned to get 11% payout, probably creditos x, y, z did not file claims, which today enables lenders a -t who did file a 15% payout vs. 11% payout.  If this is actually the situation, then you still are getting one heck of a deal.  Eliminating 85% of one's debt ---
 
Caersewiella
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:29 pm
Top

Trustee's Obligation

Postby Duer » Sat Mar 01, 2014 11:33 pm

Port is right.  Although I actually do not understand the reality of one's bankruptcy, it'd seem the amount of claims was modified to lower the amount of claims, therefore the container accessible has become larger.  If you need, you will make a motion to alter your plan to supply for the lower rate of interest, and appropriately lower your payments.  If lenders are becoming 100% within the plan, this type of motion may succeed.
Duer
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 9:11 pm
Top


Return to Bankruptcy Law

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post