Why do the liberal protestors think they deserve what successful people have WORKED for?

[golding]

Why do Tea Partiers think they Deserve a Presidency- that Liberal Americans VOTED for ?! :o

[choviohoya]

You stole it from me. And I'm commin to take it back...And Hells commin with me.

[denzell]

17% is enough? Can I pay 17%? I'd love to pay 17%!

[ingel]

As if everyone who is not rich does not work hard...

[gofraidh34]

Why must you generalize an entire group?

[tahmelapachme33]

Rich people only become rich on the backs of the working class

[napayshni65]

Take their tax rates back to when our economy was healthy, like during Clinton.

[jarel]

b^tch go back to your trailer park,
dumbass white people need to learn to shut the F6ck up ya dig?

[koltin]

The dumb-*** protesters want FREE STUFF.

[nicolas]

They don't want a hand out they want to fix the system that allowed the enormous inequality and diminished opportunities for them.

So why is there such a Panic of the Plutocrats?
Why is there such a huge criticism of this protest?

What’s going on here? The answer, surely, is that Wall Street’s Masters of the Universe realize, deep down, how morally indefensible their position is. They’re not John Galt; they’re not even Steve Jobs. They’re people who got rich by peddling complex financial schemes that, far from delivering clear benefits to the American people, helped push us into a crisis whose aftereffects continue to blight the lives of tens of millions of their fellow citizens.
Yet they have paid no price. Their institutions were bailed out by taxpayers, with few strings attached. They continue to benefit from explicit and implicit federal guarantees — basically, they’re still in a game of heads they win, tails taxpayers lose. And they benefit from tax loopholes that in many cases have people with multimillion-dollar incomes paying lower rates than middle-class families.
This special treatment can’t bear close scrutiny — and therefore, as they see it, there must be no close scrutiny.