Exactly Why Is It Attorney At Law And Not Attorney Of Law

[augustus]

Due to the fact of the background behind the profession Within the Uk, the legal profession is divided in between "solicitors" and "barristers."  Solicitors represent customers and guide them on issues.  Solicitors maintain barristers to supporter in proceedings or give legal views. America continued this tradition for several years.  Nonetheless, in the U.S., the legal profession has grow to be placed entirely inside the phrase "lawyer" or "attorney."  The functions of solicitor and counsel are merged into merely being fully a lawyer.  In reality, lawyers are accepted to a lot of cafes as "attorney and counselor-at-law." So this gets back when once again to the "at law" vs. "of law" distinction.  Attorneys(and barristers) truly go to the spot of law(the court) to advocate for clients.  Therefore, they are attorneys AT law.  The "at law" describes them likely to the place of law to advocate. At the really least that is my two cents.  I could not find this summary particularly, but I believe it appears sensible, given the real history of the situations. Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney_at_law#Comparison_to_older_domestic_terminology_and_foreign_terminology aflusche 85 weeks previously Please register to give a supplement. Please confirm your account to supply a supplement. Please register to provide a note. Please confirm your account to deliver a message.

[ardwyad]

It is because of English typical-law. At widespread law, in England, there have been two pieces of courts: courts of equity and courts of law. Courts of money managed what we'd right now contact torts or agreement conflicts -- any situation where one particular-celebration sues to be made full. Courts of law managed violations of what we'd get in touch with criminal law. Lawyers either used "at courts of law" or "at courts of value," and fundamentally matters were managed "at law" or "at equity." A single was either an "attorney at law" or an "attorney at equity." These days, simply because our courts manage both matters, the distinction does not exist these days. "Lawyer" is really only a relic of yesteryear that seems extravagant. As a result, "lawyer" = "attorney." whitedawn 85 weeks previously Please register to supply a supplement. Please confirm your account to offer a supplement. Please register to provide a note. Please confirm your account to deliver a message.

[gilbert]

In the Uk, the legal profession is divided among "solicitors" and "barristers."  Solicitors represent customers and guide them on issues.  Solicitors hold barristers to supporter in proceedings or give legal views. America continued this tradition for numerous years.  Nevertheless, in the U.S., the legal profession has turn into placed completely inside the phrase "lawyer" or "attorney."  The functions of solicitor and counsel are merged into merely becoming totally a lawyer.  Infact, lawyers are accepted to a lot of cafes as "attorney and counselor-at-law." So this gets back after once again to the "at law" vs. "of law" distinction.  Attorneys(and barristers) truly check out the location of law(the court) to advocate for consumers.  Therefore, they are attorneys AT law.  The "at law" describes them likely to the place of law to advocate. At least that is my two cents.  I could not locate this summary especially, but I think it is sensible, given the true history of the terms.

[Telfer]

At typical law, in England, there had been two sets of courts: courts of equity and courts of law. Courts of equity handled what we would now get in touch with torts or contract disputes -- any matter where 1 celebration sues to be produced complete. Courts of law handled violations of what we would contact criminal law. Attorneys either practiced "at courts of law" or "at courts of equity," and ultimately matters have been handled "at law" or "at equity." One particular was either an "attorney at law" or an "lawyer at equity." Right now, since our courts handle each matters, the distinction does not exist anymore. "Lawyer at law" is genuinely just a relic of the previous that sounds fancy. So, "lawyer at law" = "lawyer."

[Tyeis]

whitedawn, regarding your answer "It's simply because of English typical law.":Dirtlawyer Your answer is closer than mine, except you got the functions of law and chancery(equity) incorrect. Courts of law have jurisdiction more than all matters cognizable at law in the Brittish courts, e.g. torts, contracts, and criminal matters. Courts of chancery have jurisdiction more than all matters cognizable in equity, e.g. probate, guardianship, family members matters, and suits praying for equitable relief(distinct efficiency, reformation, and so on.).My appologies for just guessing, rather than searching it up in Black's.

[Elhannan]

Attorney at Law is allowed to practice law in his state A person authorized to practice law in his or her respective state and thus permitted to give legal advice, draft legal instruments, and represent clients in courts of law.-*-Someone who is not an attorney at law cannot legally practice law. Sources: http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&lr=&defl=en&q=define:ATTORNEY+AT+LAW&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title TakeaChillPillYo 85 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.

[Geffrey]

There are a number of persons who may call themselves attorneys.  Strictly speaking, an attorney acts on behalf of another; a representative.   The way lawyers do that is to follow the word "Attorney" with a modifier.  Examples: Attorney in fact, Attorney at Law, and Attorney ad litem.  When one is called an "attorney at law" it shows that he or she is representing someone in legal matters under the authority of a license to practice law, and is acting for that person.  Ergo, "attorney at law".