by Dinsmore » Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:21 am
Absolutely The "preserve, protect, and defend" clause is qualified by "to the best of my ability". I think he's done a lousy job, especially on the "preserve" notion, but I really do think that was the best of his ability. I never thought his ability was all that much, but if that's what 51% of America wants, then that's what 100% of America gets. Has he executed the office faithfully? I actually believe the answer is yes. I disagree with many of his goals and nearly all of his methods, but I think he's executed that terrible job with as much faith as it can possibly be done. Strictly speaking it may not be possible to do that job faithfully. When you're torn between the people who voted for you, the people who DIDN'T vote for you, the people to whom you have to delegate jobs, a Congress which cannot help but send mixed signals, international enemies, international allies... the job is simply not possible. "Faith" is all one has to depend on, to do the job hewing to your understanding of the spirit in which it was intended. I do not like the job that he has done. I feel that he has led the country as far to the right as he could get away with under Senate rules requiring 60% agreement on many issues, despite ekeing out the barest of majorities in two elections(and a nonexistent one in one election.) I think that he has gone far, far beyond, "It depends on the what the definition of 'is' is" in trying to lawyer his way out of clear violations of the law and the Constitution. I think that he lied and exaggerated out way into a war that will cost thousands of lives and trillions of dollars before it was over. But I think he did all that with the best of intentions. I do not believe he was merely trying to get money for his oil buddies. I believe he genuinely felt Saddam Hussein was a threat. I think he is doing what he feels is the best way to prevent another terrorist attack on the United States. I think he has knowingly violated the spirit of the laws, and taken advantage of the fact that it's too hard to hold him to the letter. I think he's wrong, and should know he's wrong, but I don't think he's violated his oath. If he has been terrible for the country(and that's the sort of thing historians will have to debate) then it's on the heads of those who elected him as much as himself, because he's done their will. PamPerdue 75 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.