by boynton35 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:17 am
It doesn't address the lack of personnel and facilities and equipment. It didn't cause any prices to go down. The ones who passed it can't even tell us what it covers because most of them didn't read it, but who wrote it? Why not start with cost control and improving the equipment in treatment facilities and adding funding for producing medical personnel? With more doctors competing for patients, they'd have to cut prices. With tax-dollar equipment provided, hospitals and clinics could operate with lower budgets, and with a formula to determine damages, insurance companies which cover malpractice could lower premiums. There could even be programs for loan forgiveness if a new doctor set up practice in nonserviced areas. Why did it pass as healthcare?