If so, what was the conclusion? If not, should there be one? If schools were to teach things based on faith rather than what was factually accepted, there'd be huge problems. However, when it comes to religion, everyone's opinions are encouraged to be considered equally valid, at least from what I've been hearing. As it's a matter of solid fact as to whether each religion is right or wrong (for example, you can't say there sort of is sort of isn't a Christian God, he's either there or he isn't), why can't there just be an investigation that determines once and for all the generally accepted religion (or no religion is they all turn out to be flawed).
I know a lot of people would say it's down to faith ect, but we've determined many things that could equally come down to faith. For example, fossils tell us a lot about history, but maybe Satan planted them to trick us, but you won't hear that alternate theory being taught in class. Likewise, if it turns out that a religion is based on too much faith and excuses and too little evidence, it could be discounted. I'm not saying it would be a crime to follow the faith, but it would allow for clarity on moral issues, avoid money being wasted on false religions, allow us to expand our knowledge ect.

