Is Killing A Person In Self-defence Justified?

by **weiford** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 6:53 pm

by **lintun** » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:16 am

Yes, if there is danger to your life.

by **Rayhourne** » Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:50 am

Yes, it's warranted if we're regular individuals like aam admi as he's aam admi in aam ka aam ya aam ki gootli. But when he's an individual who is just a believer in the concepts of or a fan of Reverend Gautam Buddha or Mahatma Gandhi or Jesus Christ then he mustn't destroy for just about any cause whatsoever. Remaining aam community be exempt from this.

by **Marline** » Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:23 pm

You will have to prove with solid evidences that killing was a result of self-defence not only to the investigators but also to the court of law

by **Wudoweard** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:25 pm

Perhaps., if there is no other option. . !

by **Bartholomew** » Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:31 pm

Killing a person is justified only when there are no other means of survival ie do OR die

by **Benji** » Thu Feb 13, 2014 3:49 pm

Not necessarily. If the situation happens that the person defending himself/herself

cannot outdo the aggressor then any step taken on the spot is justified. Killing doesn't happen with any intention in that case, it just happens.

by **Hring** » Thu Feb 20, 2014 8:19 pm

The only one answer is " YES"

by **Sigiwald** » Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:48 am

..only if there is no other way of protecting yourself

by **Aod** » Mon Mar 03, 2014 9:52 am

To destroy somebody one demands energy / energy also some resources that may be utilized hitting. If it's possible to do that this means that he's in better place compared to challenger. Nevertheless there are lots of conditions that identifies self defence. So far as I'm problem killing a person in self-defence is partially justified and partially not based upon the requirement and situation.

Advertisments:

Sponsor Links: