by osmont » Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:52 pm
If this is for law school... you should read the Criminal Code of Canada sections on illicit drugs.
1. Cannabis, cocaine, and heroin are not illegal in Canada. They are "controlled substances" which are perfectly legal to possess and use with a prescription and perfectly legal to distribute and manufacture with a license. If you say "illegal drug", it isn't just poor language -- it shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the law which makes the rest of your thesis seem bizarre.
2. "making it legal". "It" is singular, yet the previous sentence said "Illegal drugs" and then listed a three of them out. I don't know if you want to legalize all controlled substances (not that they are illegal), just those three, or just one of them? This looks like a straw man argument. I seriously doubt anyone is proposing making radioactive tracing injections, AIDs medicines, etc. available without a prescription.
3. "drug industries" There is only one "drug industry". When you make it plural, it is confusing about what the multiple industries are supposed to be. Also, "drug" is a generic term. Food is a drug. If you mean the pharmaceutical industry, say so.
4. "more problems" You can't claim this in a thesis. I don't know what existing problems they have. Economic, regulation, lawsuits, marriage problems, ... what?
5. "It has been proven to alter your decisions ..." Again, I don't know what drug you are referring to by "it". Finally, all drugs alter your decisions... so does chocolate, tea, coffee, sun light, vitamin C, etc. Too vague. And why is this bad?
6. "like alcohol". Putting illicit drugs in the same category as a non-controlled substance makes your argument extremely week.
7. "we don't need" Avoid using "we" in writing and arguments. It smacks of claiming authority and you have no idea who the reader is. If you mean Canadians, say so.
8. "toxins" Vague and shows a lack of understanding about basic science terms. Sugar, peanuts, broccoli, and water are also toxins. Too much will harm or kill certain people. Also, cannabis is not a toxin to someone with glaucoma (or most people won't think of it as one).
9. "Canada already has enough problems on their hands." Weak as it is so vague you could say that about anything. Lots of things are problems but we allow them anyway.
This isn't my opinion on controlled substances, just your writing. It is so vague and wrapped in poorly defined words that the only thing I'm fairly sure of is that you aren't knowledgeable on the subject of your own thesis.