by jorian23 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:25 am
I suppose you haven't entered a court of law before or filed a suit against someone else. That is why you are so eager to sue a hospital just because of this argument or reason?
You are convinced that the catheter caused this damage? Why? Now you are a doctor? The judge will ask you if you are a doctor, and without a medical findings or investigation of your case, the judge will rule out that your own findings is not appropriate or valid since in the first place you are not a medical practitioner yourself or a qualified physician. If you want to validate your findings you should have asked a second opinion from another doctor for that catheter if it was really the cause of your damage or not. If your own findings is base on your knowledge and intuition then I think you got no case to begin with.
After the doctors or nurses took out the catheter in the first incident you should have informed the medical staff of the hospital so that they can remedy your pain or other problem. But you didn't I suppose and you let the problem grow bigger as the time goes by. And now decided to sue the hospital for that. The negligence lies in you as their patient.
In going to sue someone, the law require you to have a CLEAN HAND, meaning that you have no other intention but to bring justice to your case. But here I clearly see that your intention is to sue them for a fault or wrong doing that they actually didn't do in the first place and you want them to pay you some cash or money for that.